THE MARS MISSION
TMM-0012 03/04/96 |
For Immediate Release
For Further Information:
The Enterprise Mission
P. O. Box 1180
Tijeras NM 87059
FAX (505) 286-6130
|
NASA FINDS 'UNTETHERED SATELLITE' HAS MAJOR UNEXPLAINED
COMPUTER PROBLEMS AFTER 'TETHER BREAK':
DISCOVERY BOOSTS MARS MISSION EXPLANATION
'FOR WHAT REALLY HAPPENED'
Scientists associated with an independent space research
group, "The Mars Mission," made a revolutionary proposal yesterday: that
NASA's failed $450 million "tethered satellite experiment" broke its tether
Sunday evening NOT because of mechanical tether problems, but "because
of long-forgotten electrical properties in space... tracing back to key
physics experiments carried out over 150 years ago by one of the fathers'
of modern science, Michael Faraday." NASA's newly-announced discovery
of "major computer problems" on-board the now free-flying half-ton Italian
satellite, and "unexplained empty fuel tanks" strongly suggests that the
Mars Mission researchers got it right!
Mars Mission Founder and Principal Investigator, Richard
C. Hoagland -- winner of the Angstrom Foundation's 1993 First International
Angstrom Medal for Excellence in Science -- had this to say about NASA's
latest announcement:
"In our model, we are predicting that NASA will find that
a severe voltage spike' occurred -- tens of thousands of volts -- just
as the tether broke; this will be due to the major (unanticipated) charge
build-up, occurring between the satellite and shuttle (which, according
to NASA, was deliberately ungrounded for four minutes, at that precise
moment) just at sunset. This simply caused a catastrophic electrical arc-over,
from the tether to the tower in the payload bay, literally frying the
tether -- which then just pulled apart (due to the significant tension
forces from the deployed satellite, moving in a higher, slower orbit,
over 12 miles above the shuttle)."
Hoagland continued:
"As we pointed out yesterday, this is not the first time this
has happened to a NASA spacecraft. Now that NASA is reporting that the
computer on-board the Italian satellite was fried," and the fuel on-board
mysteriously depleted, this is looking less and less like a mechanical
break' in the tether . . . and more and more what we think it is -- an
eerie rerun of the same electrical weirdness' that struck the unmanned
Voyager 2 spacecraft fifteen years ago, in 1981 -- as it flew too close
to Saturn."
According to Hoagland, NASA published at that time a detailed
description of the problems with Voyager 2 at Saturn, written by a key
mission scientist, Dr. David Morrison; the official NASA record is called
"Voyages to Saturn" [NASA Headquarters (1982) NASA SP-451]. Says Hoagland:
"Apparently no one else in NASA read it. And if they did,
they didn't connect the bizarre electrical properties of space they encountered
out at Saturn... with a manned space shuttle's "towed satellite experiment"
they planned to conduct in near-earth space years later. And certainly,
no NASA physicists seem to have remembered these key 150-year-old Faraday
experiments in basic electrical physics -- which, in our opinion, now
hold the clues to what went wrong on Sunday night; these latest NASA findings
on the separate and simultaneous satellite electrical malfunction almost
cinch it. "
According to NASA's fifteen-year-old "Voyages to Saturn":
"...August 26, 1981 ... As the Voyager spacecraft reemerged
from behind Saturn [11:58 p.m.], its radio signals were received at the
Deep Space Network Station in Australia and transmitted directly to JPL
[NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, in Pasadena] ... mission managers and
engineers watched the signal carefully to make sure that all went well
... Their initial delight at the reacquisition of the signal quickly turned
to worry and despair. The telemetry signals were not normal, with several
instruments showing unexplained and peculiar transmissions. Engineering
data indicated that near ring plane crossing the small control thrusters
on the spacecraft had made several unprogrammed and unexpected firings.
Worst of all, the scan platform, with its cameras and spectrometers, was
not pointed where it was supposed to be ... As more engineering data from
Voyager accumulated, it became evident that the scan platform had frozen
in its back-and-forth, or azimuth, motion ... Unfortunately, it had stopped
in a place where sensitive instruments could be damaged by sunlight; thus
... at about 2 a.m. [August 27], instructions [were transmitted] to move
the scan platform to a safe position ... By 6 a.m. it was apparent that
the spacecraft had responded ... and that the initial problems with other
systems had apparently repaired themselves, leaving only the scan platform
to be dealt with ... At 9 a.m. the critical playback from the on-board
tape recorder began ... Even after the tape recordings had been received,
it was still not evident how the failure had occurred. It did not appear
to be a discrete event associated with the ring plane, but rather a progressive
degradation of the capability of the scan platform to move as directed.
One could not even be sure that the problem really was with the hardware,
as opposed to the [computer] software that provided the commands to the
scan platform ... At the 2 p.m. science meeting, the most spectacular
results [from the tape playback] were presented by Fred Scarf [Principal
Investigator of the Voyager Plasma Wave Experiment]. Very close to the
time of ring plane crossing, the plasma wave instrument recorded activity
a million times the normal energy level. The high frequency of the signal
proved that it could not be ordinary plasma waves, but more likely an
electrical phenomenon taking place at the spacecraft ... The roaring sound
... on the tape ... sounding almost like a hailstorm striking a tin roof,
sent chills down the spines of the seventy-five scientists attending the
meeting. But did this unexpected plasma activity really have anything
to do with the scan platform failure? No one could tell [emphasis added]..."
According to Hoagland, this variety of reported systems
failures aboard Voyager at the time of Saturn ring plane crossing, fifteen
years ago -- which later, mysteriously "repaired themselves" -- bears
a striking resemblance now to what NASA is currently reporting -- re the
ill-health of its former "tethered satellite," now orbiting the Earth.
And, says Hoagland, both seem traceable to the same cause:
"The profound, totally-unappreciated, critical effects
of a long-forgotten physics... that NASA obviously needs to know..."
|